<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4CD46651.8020107@gmail.com" type="cite">António
Pedro Marques-<br>
Everyone's entitled to their opinions. Not to their facts. If the
word
<br>
'green' isn't there, it isn't there, and repeatedly discussing why
it <b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>is<span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b>
<br>
there is inconsiderate.
</blockquote>
<br>
Only a aspergers-debilitated geek would be interested in policing
what is a "fact" from what is an alternate reading from what is an
error based on another posters erroneous reading popularly bandied
about. It's fine to correct someone on the facts when you think you
have noted an error. But if you go the step further and ascribe
malicious motives or categorize the person's perceived error as
"this is what you always do", I'm going to read you as a jerk.<br>
<br>
u+16b9<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>