<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
I didn't use any terms, you did. So I don't understand what is insane about my usage of terms that I didn't use in the first place. I just asked a straight question that you answered with another question in true "master to apprentice" fashion. Your friends must be proud.<BR>
<BR>
As I said before this discussion for me ends here. We can just save ourselves (and others in this list) from more wasted time.<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BR>> I am actually criticizing your use of terms, which I maintain is insane.<BR>> <BR>> The fact that just about everybody else, not only atheists, uses terms in<BR>> a similar fashion to you is totally nuncupatory.<BR>> <BR>> .<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ><BR>> > Fair enough. Guess I missed the memo on Brunians' views and I<BR>> > misinterpreted him. However it is in my opinion pointless to argue such<BR>> > views (or at least I have no interest in arguing those and for that I<BR>> > appologise to Brunians) when one takes "the natural world (as he defines<BR>> > it) and the entire universe to be an argument for his beliefs and in<BR>> > short, his observations are beliefs and his beliefs are observations".<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > Over and out.<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> >> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 10:05:12 -0400<BR>> >> From: dstockhoff@verizon.net<BR>> >> To: urth@lists.urth.net<BR>> >> Subject: Re: (urth) Religious writers and audiences<BR>> >><BR>> >> Pedro<BR>> >><BR>> >> Brunians is not being evasive. Rather, as far as I can tell, he<BR>> >> considers the existence of the natural world (as he defines it) and the<BR>> >> entire universe to be an argument for his beliefs; in short, his<BR>> >> observations are beliefs and his beliefs are observations. There is no<BR>> >> light between them and therefore no need to construct an argument for<BR>> >> them.<BR>> >><BR>> >> ------------------------------<BR>> >><BR>> >> Message: 3<BR>> >> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:41:17 +0300<BR>> >> From: Pedro Pereira <domus_artemis@hotmail.com><BR>> >> To: <urth@lists.urth.net><BR>> >> Subject: Re: (urth) Religious writers and audiences<BR>> >> Message-ID: <COL105-W362F28CE7274F1620D236285D40@phx.gbl><BR>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> What!??!?!<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> I'm not reading a book and demanding that the author makes it "easier"<BR>> >> for me; I'm asking for a straight answer from someone that accuses me<BR>> >> (and others) of beying insane in an internet forum. But thanks for<BR>> >> nothing. I'm not going to waste more time with this.<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> _______________________________________________<BR>> >> Urth Mailing List<BR>> >> To post, write urth@urth.net<BR>> >> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net<BR>> ><BR>> > _________________________________________________________________<BR>> > Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.<BR>> > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969_______________________________________________<BR>> > Urth Mailing List<BR>> > To post, write urth@urth.net<BR>> > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Urth Mailing List<BR>> To post, write urth@urth.net<BR>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net<BR><BR> <br /><hr />Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. <a href='https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969' target='_new'>Sign up now.</a></body>
</html>