<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Recent lurker, first-time poster. Please excuse any formatting offenses!<br>
<br>
As part of blog discussion on another topic, someone sent me a link
regarding the historical development of Catholic positions on torture:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.rtforum.org/lt/lt119.html">http://www.rtforum.org/lt/lt119.html</a><br>
<br>
And the following caught my eye (the middle part):<br>
<br>
<br>
<b>A1. Tertullian (3rd
century).</b> This early representative of patristic thought
follows the radically pacifist tendency of not a few Christians at
that time who tended to take the Gospel’s ‘counsels of
perfection’ as universally binding precepts. Certainly, in
Tertullian’s judgment, any complicity in torture –
either ordering it or personally applying it – is definitely
ruled out for a disciple of Jesus. Arguing that no soldier, after
converting to Christianity, should continue in the army, especially
given its pagan character, he asks rhetorically, <br>
<br>
"[S]hall the son
of peace take part in the battle when it does not become him even
to sue at law? And shall <i>he</i> apply the chain, and the prison,
<i>and the torture</i>, and the punishment, who is not the avenger
even of his own wrongs?"<sup><small><b><a
href="http://www.rtforum.org/lt/lt119.html#FN_1">1</a></b></small></sup>
<br>
<br>
In similar vein, discussing
"what offices a Christian man may hold", he refers to a recent case
wherein a Church member had the opportunity to receive high public
office as a magistrate. Tertullian argues that it would be morally
impossible for this man to satisfy both the Gospel’s demands
and those of Roman law, for that would require him to abstain not
only from all public pagan sacrifices, oaths, etc., but also from
"sitting in judgment on anyone’s life or character, . . .
neither condemning nor fore-condemning; binding no one, imprisoning
<i>or torturing no one</i>".<sup><small><b><a
href="http://www.rtforum.org/lt/lt119.html#FN_2">2</a></b></small></sup>
These are the earliest known
explicit Christian statements on the morality of torture.<br>
<br>
<br>
I have no argument to make here---I merely find the references to
binding etc.very applicable to Severian. It's almost a summary of his
daily routine. (Recall that "lictor" means "he who binds.")<br>
<br>
Can Christ not be a Christian?<br>
<br>
David Stockhoff<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:mailman.12745.1227126559.21489.urth-urth.net@lists.urth.net"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:21:06 -0500
From: "John Watkins" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:john.watkins04@gmail.com"><john.watkins04@gmail.com></a>
Subject: Re: (urth) Shadow, Chapter X
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:urth@lists.urth.net"><urth@lists.urth.net></a>
Message-ID:
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:93d4039f0811191221o759bc72eo76de8f2db47db650@mail.gmail.com"><93d4039f0811191221o759bc72eo76de8f2db47db650@mail.gmail.com></a>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
</pre>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">B) many Christians would also find the notion of an Exucutioner Christ to be beyond the pale of heresy and think this book was some sort of evil perversion.
<!----></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
I agree. I think, actually, that that's one of the more beautiful and
Christian notions of the book--Severian is very much the Stone That
Was Rejected.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">And if he's not an analogue Christ, Why is he carrying a cross around for 3 1/2 books? No one has addressed the ideas about this that I posted in October.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/2008-October/010121.html">http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/2008-October/010121.html</a>
~sonofwitz
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Well, I'll have to look at that posting more closely, but Christ
Himself tells his followers that they all must take up the cross.
Severian carrying the cross makes him a "Christian" figure.
It's not unlike Tolkien's work, really. Frodo is clearly a "Christ
figure" in a limited sense--he carries the Ring, which is more or less
the Cross, his three woundings correspond with Christ's wounds or
three falls, he makes a great sacrifice, he too is the Stone the Was
Rejected, etc. But no one thinks that Frodo is meant to BE Christ in
the sense that Aslan is meant to be Christ. I think Severian is much
more like Frodo than Aslan.
</pre>
<br>
</blockquote>
<BR><BR>
<TABLE width=400><HR>
<P style="FONT: 9pt/11pt verdana"><a href="http://www.avast.com">avast! Antivirus</a>: Outbound message clean.
<P style="FONT: 8pt/11pt verdana">Virus Database (VPS): 081120-0, 11/20/2008<BR>Tested on: 11/20/2008 2:49:40 PM<BR><FONT color=gray>avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2008 ALWIL Software.</FONT></P>
<TBODY></TBODY></TABLE>
<BR>
</body>
</html>