(urth) resurrecting a 2002 thread that posits an alternative lineage for Sev

António Marques entonio at gmail.com
Mon Oct 6 06:55:35 PDT 2014


Not necessarily. Pagan has meant 'polytheist' from early on.
Non-polytheists might be hereticals, infidels, whatever, without
necessarily being pagan.
The idea that the Roman Church is 'pagan' is part of Protestant folklore.
No one else pays any attention to it.

On 6 October 2014 14:23, Norwood, Frederick Hudson <NORWOODR at mail.etsu.edu>
wrote:

> The word pagan means: neither Christian nor Jewish.  (The earlier meaning
> -- a rustic, a rude fellow, not schooled in the ways of the big city -- is
> obsolete.)  Therefore Catholics are not pagans.  There may or may not be a
> continuous progression from the pagan to the Christian, but as soon as you
> say "I believe in God, the Father, almighty, maker of heaven and earth, and
> in Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord," you stop being a pagan.
>
> Rick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Urth [mailto:urth-bounces at lists.urth.net] On Behalf Of Lee
> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2014 8:28 AM
> To: urth at urth.net
> Subject: (urth) resurrecting a 2002 thread that posits an alternative
> lineage for Sev
>
> >Marc Aramini: when I was a young boy was not that he was a normal person
> but a Christ.  The pagan gods are
>
> >the unnatural creatures in New Sun whose mythologies are incorporated and
> transformed into Christian stories
>
> >[such as the flood and the story of Genesis].
>
>
> I would mention that the pagan gods of earth are actually of the MOST
> natural origin; things such as earth and sky
>
> and ocean and weather. More advanced religions serve a function only in
> more advanced, i.e. civilized, urbanized
>
> societies.
>
>
> Perhaps calling Severian a pagan god was an oversimplified and misleading
> analogy. My usual way of describing
>
> the analogy is as a demi-god, akin to the half-breed Greco-Roman heroes.
> Like Severian, they were born not
>
> knowing their true parentage and unaware of the source of their superhuman
> abilities and skills.
>
>
> >While clearly Wolfe loves playing with mythical creatures, the importance
> of his Catholicism to his works shouldn't
>
> >be understated.
>
>
> I think you are seeing a disconnect which Wolfe does not; i.e. the
> importance of paganism to Catholicism shouldn't
>
> be understated. The idea that Hercules serves as a prototype for Jesus
> certainly doesn't originate with me.
>
>
> >Antonio Marques: That is, Christ's ability to perform miracles wasn't in
> any way different from that of his disciples,
>
> >who also performed them through faith in God.
>
>
> I think this is a good observation. Later Christian saints also are known
> to perform miracles through the power of faith.
>
>  In contrast to Jesus, Severian had some very devoted and faithful
> followers as The Concillator. He had a cult, The
>
> Pelerines, who were completely devoted to the reverence of the Conciliator
> and who were even in possession of the
>
> Claw. None off them appeared to have any  hint of the powers Severian
> channeled from the New Sun.
>
>
> >Matthew Weber:   Christ is a hypostasis of divinity and humanity.  It's
> correct to say that his power is not magical...
>
> >... Insofar as Wolfe is an orthodox RC, it can be assumed that this is
> what he believes as well.
>
>
> On his own Catholicism, with regard to his writing, Wolfe says of himself
> (in the Larry McCaffrey interview):
>
>
> >I am a practicing Catholic, although I don't think that designation would
> give people much of an idea about what my
>
> >beliefs are. People have a very limited, stereotyped view of what it
> means to be a Catholic.......
>
> >.....I certainly don't dismiss religious or other mystical forms of
> speculation out of hand. I read it and try to make my own
>
> >judgments about it. And in The Book Of The New Sun I tried to work out
> some of the implications of my beliefs.
>
>
> >Marc Aramini: Yes, I am quite sure Wolfe subscribes to the whole "one in
> being with the Father" creed - Christ is fully human
>
> >and fully divine (a similar paradox to the whole three in one, one in
> three theological parsing - we aren't dealing with
>
> >Arianism or Gnosticism in Wolfe ... oh wait, maybe sometimes we are ....)
>
>
> I think this is a good discussion. In deciding whether Catholicism is
> separate from paganism or is part of a continuous
>
> progression from it, I think there is sort of a Necker Cube effect going
> on. The picture changes, depending on what
>
> perspective you are viewing from.  My sense is that Wolfe is aware of this
> Necker Cube and plays with the different
>
> perspectives in the course of his writing.
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20141006/cfb9d175/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Urth mailing list