(urth) Supervisionists

[DAVID STOCKHOFF]

Now, that is an obscure reference.



On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:02 AM, "Norwood, Frederick Hudson" <NORWOODR at mail.etsu.edu> wrote:
 

>
>
> 
>“If I had any supervision, Fred, would I be riding around in a chicken coop with a lion?”
> 
>Rick Norwood
> 
>From:Urth [mailto:urth-bounces at lists.urth.net] On Behalf Of Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
>Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 2:18 PM
>To: The Urth Mailing List
>Subject: Re: (urth) general video discussing Wolfe and literature
> 
>Superversionists?
> 
>On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at gmail.com> wrote:
>That's how it's done- beat 'em at their own game.  Are practitioners superverts or superverters?
>
>
>On Tuesday, November 11, 2014, Matthew King <automatthew at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 11, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Otto Jack Petersen <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> he kind of uses the trappings of postmodernism to undermine its commitment to utter fragmentation and subjectivity
>
>"Superversion" as John C. Wright calls it.
>_______________________________________________
>Urth Mailing List
>To post, write urth at urth.net
>Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
>_______________________________________________
>Urth Mailing List
>To post, write urth at urth.net
>Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
>
>
> 
>-- 
>Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
>_______________________________________________
>Urth Mailing List
>To post, write urth at urth.net
>Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20141112/1b87f402/attachment-0002.htm>