(urth) fifth head owlet- wolf
marcaramini at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 29 06:42:47 PDT 2013
Originally the Shadow Children were saying they were from earth, more or less. After the percentage shifts to a 1 to 1 ratio, they were saying they weren't sure if Sandwalker's people or the Shadow Children were "human". Did their uncertainty just come because the ratio shifted - I was asking, in other words, if their original claim was more valid than the second claim, that the Old Wise One had made a mistake and Sandwalker was of human stock.
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Gerry Quinn <gerry at bindweed.com> wrote:
From: Gerry Quinn <gerry at bindweed.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) fifth head owlet- wolf
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
Date: Friday, March 29, 2013, 6:28 AM
From: Marc Aramini
> Excellent point on his empathy.
I also agree with Tony's analysis (though I'm not certain Sandwalker is yet part of the Group Norm at this time).
> Do you feel the shadow children and the construct the old wise one, called
> the group norm, becomes more confused about who was once human
> because the proportion at the end shifts to one shadow child and
> Sandwalker? where before he was ' more' certain of who came from the
> yellow star originally because there were more shadow children dominating
> the norm, should his assertion of who is human be more 'valid' with the
> larger percentage of shadow children?
He makes this pretty clear in the passage starting "Now I am half a man..."
- Gerry Quinn
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Urth