(urth) Thecla's "Identity"
Marc Aramini
marcaramini at yahoo.com
Fri Apr 5 10:49:22 PDT 2013
I agree with Ross that Wolfe is profoundly modernist. Pound was certainly a fascist; I will have to research his spiritual proclivities. There is a kind of very benevolent authoritarianism in much spiritual philosophy that I think influences Wolfe at least marginally as well.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman at yahoo.com> wrote:
> That's interesting. Do we know that Eliot, Pound, and Tate inspired Wolfe? And was Pound Catholic?
>
> Jerry Friedman
>
> From: Ross Arlen Tieken <ross.a.tieken at gmail.com>
> To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2013 10:58 AM
> Subject: Re: (urth) Thecla's "Identity"
>
> New Criticism is also appropriate because Wolfe, while primarily inspired by Borges, is also inspired by the Catholic English writing in the 1930's to the 1960's--Tolkien, Eliot, Pound, Tate, etc.-- Modernist-Traditionalist writers, a tradition in which I think Wolfe has a prominent place. The New Criticism was supposed to encourage and analyze this type of writing. "Meaning is reconstruction rather than deconstruction" is actually a beautiful little summary of why this is so. Remember that modernism is not postmodernism (although they are in close relation), and Wolfe is definitely a modernist writer.
>
> R
>
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Marc Aramini wrote:
>
>> I agree- new criticism (and historical criticism for valid context most of the time) are the most sound and applicable techniques.
>>
>> I feel like the new critical approach would get the most out of Wolfe- meaning is reconstruction rather than deconstruction. For example, Reading e e cummings "anyone lived in a pretty how town" through that lens makes perfect sense, though words are used outside their normal parts of speech- meaning is reinforced rather than lost. Much of post modern thought is intentionally losing one self in a haze, getting trapped in the Cartesian circle with no egress in the absence of absolute parameters of signification.
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 8:07 AM, DAVID STOCKHOFF <dstockhoff at verizon.net> wrote:
>> They have their own abstract methods, and while they try to make those methods concrete, they also make them inflexible and blind.
>>>
>>> I always liked New Criticism because I could get my mind around a "perfect" but "perfectly flawed" structure, where function transcends form. But the French guys always lost me at some point.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
> Ross Arlen Tieken
> Religious Studies
> Rice University
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20130405/744ae13d/attachment-0004.htm>
More information about the Urth
mailing list