(urth) Seawrack and the Mother

[David Stockhoff]

On 9/30/2012 4:27 AM, Jeff Wilson wrote:
> On 9/23/2012 5:27 PM, David Stockhoff wrote:
>
>> It doesn't quite fit. I meant (1) two sexes (a) separate or (b)
>> combined, or (2) no sexes, but also pointing out that a single male or
>> female seeder/birther/creator isn't really any of those. That is, you
>> can't have only one sex. Incest is a bit like two-housed
>> hermaphroditism, from this perspective.
>
>
> I think you can have a single sexed creator if the created is the 
> other sex.
>
How would that work, exactly?

---If a female creator spawned (through parthenogenesis?) a male creation?

---Or if a female creation developed from a sperm cell?

Parent-offspring incest would then follow. It's conceivable, but sounds 
deliberately perverse, like something Lovecraftian or Milton's Satan.