(urth) Robots
Jeff Wilson
jwilson at clueland.com
Thu Mar 29 09:05:20 PDT 2012
On 3/28/2012 8:16 PM, Allan Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:20 PM, David Stockhoff <dstockhoff at verizon.net
> <mailto:dstockhoff at verizon.net>> wrote:
>
> On 3/28/2012 1:11 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
>
> David Stockhoff wrote:
>
> Without having read the story (though I will), I want to
> comment that the
> "moral robot" has been around at least since Asimov's "3
> laws," which
> basically hardwired robots to be MORE moral than humans.
> Naturally they
> represent the kind of rational and dispassionate morality
> that we humans,
> for a few hundred years at least, were imagined to aspire to.
>
> More to the point, the Three Laws of Robotics are designed to make
> Asimovian robots the perfect slaves, and thus a coded way of talking
> about the situation of minority persons in general and blacks in
> particular
> at a time when you couldn't openly talk about that stuff in
> popular fiction.
> (If you have any doubt about this, note how hostile humans refer
> to a
> robot as "boy.") Reading Asimov's early robot stories with this
> in mind
> opens a whole world of social commentary right there on the surface.
>
> Yes, the double-standard regarding murder is especially ironic in
> that light. I don't actually recall that use of "boy"---but then I
> wouldn't, would I.
>
>
> Ah, right--I remember this from Elijah Baley in _The Caves of Steel_,
> before he became a stinking robo-sympathizer. Excellent points. I
> remember wondering if Asimov was making a coherent point with that, or
> just appropriating a term for its emotional impact.
For purposes of scholarly research:
http://nullfile.com/ebooks/%28ebook%29%20Asimov,%20Isaac%20-%20I,%20Robot.pdf
--
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at clueland.com
Computational Intelligence Laboratory - Texas A&M Texarkana
< http://www.tamut.edu/CIL >
More information about the Urth
mailing list