(urth) Chesterton'a "lunar virescence"

[Dan'l Danehy-Oakes]

Well, one has to allow for his ideas about things like women's suffrage...

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:50 PM, David Stockhoff <dstockhoff at verizon.net> wrote:
> On 6/1/2012 3:48 PM, entonio at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I think you have to be a catholic or a 'paleoconservative' in order not to
>> be offended by Chesterton, unless you are very well read (quality more than
>> quantity), in which case you may choose to enjoy his genius past anything
>> else.
>>
>> Maybe Wolfe can afford to be soft spoken because Chesterton took upon
>> himself the dirty work that needed done. The man was a Maccabee.
>
>
> Interesting. What should I be offended by? His politics, or his religion? I
> especially appreciate his disdain for imperialism and its expression in the
> press.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net



-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes