(urth) This Week in Google Alerts: Home Fires

[David Stockhoff]

On 4/12/2012 4:20 PM, António Marques wrote:
> David Stockhoff wrote:
>> On 4/12/2012 2:47 PM, António Pedro Marques wrote:
>>> David Stockhoff wrote (12-04-2012 19:40):
>>>> On 4/12/2012 2:33 PM, António Pedro Marques wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> All we know about prisons we learned from Oz.
>>>>
>>>> That explains a lot about you, Antonio. Please excuse me from your 
>>>> "we,"
>>>> since I never saw it.
>>>
>>> If you never saw it, what can you know about what it explains or not?
>>
>> This makes no sense.
>
> It was you who recently asked if I was impervious to sarcasm.

No---it was satire and shame I asked about.
>
>>>> I prefer reading about scientific and legal studies of issues rather
>>>> than
>>>> TV shows about them. Perhaps as a result, I don't say "I don't care at
>>>> all what happens to murderers."
>>>
>>> It's more fashionable not to care about innocents, n'est-ce pas? For
>>> sure it's grounded on a vast amount of science.
>>
>> This makes no sense either. Did someone express such a sentiment?
>>
>> Recently you asked someone if he read what you wrote. Did you read what
>> I wrote?
>
> I did. I haven't seen seen a solution on your part. You chose to take 
> exception with my suggestion on how to aggravate a system which I said 
> from the start that should be pragmatic and do all it could not to 
> take away what it couldn't restore, but I have seen no one address the 
> problem of norwegian terrorists who face smaller sentences than 
> would-be neighbourhood watchers who nobody will ever know for sure 
> whether they are real murderers or not.

I didn't realize this was a topic.