(urth) Seal of Pas
Gerry Quinn
gerry at bindweed.com
Fri Oct 28 10:18:32 PDT 2011
From: Gwern Branwen
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Gerry Quinn <gerry at bindweed.com> wrote:
> > From a naturalistic perspective, the numbers shouldn’t have any significance
> > that we would understand in the story: they should encode the contents
> > and/or date of storage, serial numbers etc.
> It has been a while, but wasn't there just one sequence of numbers
> which made up a Seal of Pas? If the sequence doesn't change, then none
> of those 3 suggestions would work (serial numbers which don't change
> are not useful; it's unlikely that every single chamber would have
> been sealed at the same time (especially since a datestamp that big
> ought to be accurate down to really small units like nanoseconds) or
> would have the same contents).
We are only told the sequence on one such seal. I think we are to infer that all the seals are different. Silk later finds the dust from a broken seal of a cabinet that had contained human embryos, but he does not encounter, or at least doesn’t notice, any other intact seals.
The seal had about 36 digits. I just interpret it as the equivalent of a barcode; we don’t know what information was on it but we can guess what *kind* of information was there.
- Gerry Quinn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20111028/8c3e6fdd/attachment-0004.htm>
More information about the Urth
mailing list