(urth) Father Inire as Dionysus

António Pedro Marques entonio at gmail.com
Mon Oct 24 15:05:33 PDT 2011


Andrew Mason wrote (24-10-2011 22:57):
> Antonio Pedro Marquez wrote:
>>
>> *Iirc*, it was put to rest that the Old Autarch was *not* the Appian
>> mentioned in the text; however, 'Appian' has become such a traditional name
>> for him, that as a matter of List Lore I think it can prevail (the name, not
>> the identification - so we have two Appians, the one in the text and the Old
>> Autarch). *Iirc*.
>
> Can the custom of calling the sea-monsters 'Megatherians' be
> sanctified in the same way?

For it to be the same way, it would have to have been settled that the 17 
Great Megatherians were not the sea-monsters.



More information about the Urth mailing list