(urth) Babbiehorn?: Was: a sincere question mostly for roy

[Gerry Quinn]

From: David Stockhoff 

> So let's agree that main objection to a time-traveling Rajan is not the 
> presence of a hat, but the time-traveling Rajan himself. That is, the 
> theory rests on demonstration of time-traveling, not on motives for 
> wearing a hat. Which therefore are irrelevant, unless the hat can be 
> shown to be a primary motivation for his time traveling, in which case 
> it still doesn't touch on the basic possibility.

It’s a minor issue.  It can be explained away if he’s a time-travelling Rajan, though i’s still one more thing to be explained away.

The bigger problem with the hat is that it’s connected to Pike.  After all, it’s Pike that Silk saw.  If the ghost had dropped something better associated with the Rajan it would be confirmatory evidence for time travel.  Otherwise it seems more like confirmatory evidence for Pike.

- Gerry Quinn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20111118/07430bca/attachment-0004.htm>