(urth) "Realistic fiction leaves out too much." - Gene Wolfe

[David Stockhoff]

Is it impossible? I had no idea. ;)

On 4/30/2011 11:42 PM, Jeff Wilson wrote:
> On 4/30/2011 10:23 PM, Matthew Knapton wrote:
>> Well you're asking a mouthful there. It's certainly meaningful, at least
>> - what constitutes a morally wrong thing, whether such a thing can be
>> justified (and how, if so), etc, are all real issues in the field of
>> ethics. More particularly, Omelas seems like a utilitarian society; a
>> criticism of it is a criticism of its principles, and there has been
>> plenty of criticism and discussion of utilitarian ideas over the years.
>>
>> Whether the story is useful is less easy to say, though even if it is
>> you can't really move from dismissing it to dismissing the large swathes
>> of ethics it happens to touch upon :)
>
> But there aren't any societies that are able to avoid harm to 
> innocents for the benefit of others. How can it be morally wrong when 
> it's impossible to do otherwise?
>


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 110501-0, 05/01/2011
Tested on: 5/1/2011 8:08:22 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2011 AVAST Software.
http://www.avast.com