(urth) Problematic element in chronology - Red Giants

Jeff Wilson jwilson at io.com
Mon May 30 17:37:08 PDT 2011


On 5/30/2011 6:23 PM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
>
> From: "Jeff Wilson" <jwilson at io.com>
>> On 5/30/2011 1:21 PM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
>>>
>>> From: "Jeff Wilson" <jwilson at io.com>
>>>> On 5/29/2011 7:48 PM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I don't think the issue of small black holes matters to BotNS - the
>>>>> black hole described is absorbtive, and thus large enough to have a
>>>>> low
>>>>> temperature. In the context of black holes, there's actually not much
>>>>> margin between the temperature of a stellar interior and that of outer
>>>>> space. They are either colder or hotter than either, and those that
>>>>> persist are certainly colder.
>>>>
>>>> Where is it described?
>>>
>>> Standard theory (you can find it in Wikipedia etc.)
>>
>> I mean, where is the black hole described in BotNS? How is it
>> characterized sufficiently to make those proceeding inferences?
>
> It's described as black.

And this description is to be found where?

-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
Computational Intelligence Laboratory - Texas A&M Texarkana
< http://www.tamut.edu/CIL >



More information about the Urth mailing list