(urth) Wolfe's brilliance or my denseness?

[Marc Aramini]

but one more thing: any bible thumping type would immediately associate Dorcas with resurrection as soon as they heard the name, that's just the way it is in the bible and the way Wolfe works.  He plays by the cultural symbolist rules to build up meaning to some degree, even though he is a bit sneakier than most.

--- On Mon, 5/23/11, António Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> wrote:

>> else.
> 
> > By the way, "for the record" I had no idea the old
> man's "Cas" was
> > Dorcas.  I probably realized that on some
> reread.  It's even possible
> > that I needed it pointed out (maybe here).  Lee
> Berman's point about the
> > pronunciation was part of it.
> 
> I should point out that my instictive reading of Dorcas was
> DAWRK-us (gave up on IPA), possibly not that far from the
> AmE pronunciation, but not being acquainted with the name I
> switfly considered door-KAZZ, seeing as there was a guy
> nearby looking for a KAZZ. My language's orthography is more
> (morpho)phonemic than phonetic, but unstressed sounds,
> although reduced, aren't neutralised as in english (so
> unstressed e/i may merge, as may o/u, but a doesn't merge
> with anything), so we do pay attention to the graphic part
> of it because it does line up with the pronunciation, even
> if the rules are complex (they're part of the language,
> anyway).
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>