(urth) do the Hierogrammates *care* about the megatherians?

[Jack Smith]

I agree that the number 17 being connected to the Soviet poliburo is
probably a myth.  I've seen it repeated many times but no source is ever
given.

Does anyone have a Soviet or Communist reference?  If not, we should
probably drop it.


On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Sergei SOLOVIEV <soloviev at irit.fr> wrote:

> I would like to slow down the growth of one more myth - what is the source
> of the idea
> that the number of the memebers of Politburo was 17? First of all, the
> "norm" changed
> several times. The first one, in 1917, had, as far as I remember, 7
> members.
> Then the number varied - from 8 (in 1920-es) to 25 (in 1970-es). That is,
> in the
> USSR. In China, it varied as well, between 19 and 25. To me the expression
> "group of 17" has somewhat Chinese flavour - like "gang of four"
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gang_of_Four (nowadays there is also a rock
> group
> with this name).
>
> Best
>
> Sergei
>
>
> Le Dimanche 22 Mai 2011 02:52 CEST, Jerry Friedman <
> jerry_friedman at yahoo.com> a écrit:
>
>
>  > From: James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com>
>>
>> > >> The other options  are that megatherians refers to a line of  human
>> rulers >that
>> > >> have ruled under  Abaia's authority or a line  of human rulers that
>> have
>> > >> fashioned themselves as  being like  Abaia or all the undersea
>> powers.
>> > > Is there an objection to those  options?
>> > > Yeah, but I get that its aesthetic. It's just that it still  leaves
>> open the >question "Why 17?" "Who did they rule?" We at least know
>>  something of monstrous >undersea rulers. A reference to a some unknown
>> rulers who  are vaguely related >to one of the giant beasts or all of them
>> strikes me as  random. Some people >prefer that. I don't. Like the carefully
>> laid structures in  this novel that >have been identified or are glimpsed.
>>
>> Okay, is there an objection to the idea that the "megatherian" human
>> rulers were early rulers of Ascia?
>>
>> We don't know why 17, but if there are 17 sea creatures, we don't know why
>> that number either.  (Other than the reference to the Politburo in either
>> case, or the speculations in my previous post.)
>>
>> It's true that the relation of the present "Group of 17" to these
>> hypothetical 17 founders is vague, but so is the relation of the present
>> "Group of 17" to the hypothetical 17 sea creatures.
>>
>> > >> And I  think we have  enough information to put the pieces together:
>> > >> > >> There are 17 recognized  "Great Beasts" who are ruling or have
>>  ruled Urth.
>> > > Part of Urth?  And what makes you say they're  ruling?
>> > > Their various territories. They rule as the Storm King rules in  'An
>> Evil >Guest'. And Abaia has an army.
>>
>> Okay, that's one.
>>  > >> Why would people NOT  write a  history of the alien powers that have
>> >controlled
>> > >> and  influenced life on Urth for  millenia?
>> > > Because they have no  material?  It seems quite possible that people
>> know >very
>> > > little of  those undersea powers' lives.
>> > > I think that's unlikely. The Ascians don't  *have* to follow Abaia.
>> They choose >to (or originally chose to) for rational  reasons.
>>
>> Interesting.  That never occurred to me.  I always imagined that the
>> Ascians knew no more about Abaia's life than Lovecraft's characters knew
>> about the life stories of Yog-Sothoth and Nyarlathotep.
>>
>> Severian tells us, as I recall, that Abaia et al. could kill all the
>> humans in the world but don't do so because they want to enslave everyone.
>>  This suggests the possibility that they threatened the Ascians or just the
>> future Ascian leaders, who went along.  I guess you could call that
>> "rational reasons".  The Commonwealth, however, called their bluff.  Or
>> maybe the sea creatures possessed the rulers of Ascia, as Dan'l suggested.
>>  I don't see any hint that the Ascians decided to follow Abaia because of
>> his impressive CV.
>>
>> I think we'll have to disagree about what "Lives of" could mean.
>>
>> Jerry Friedman
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>



-- 
Best wishes,
Jack
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20110522/09bfe7f4/attachment-0009.htm>