(urth) not quite Father Inire's mirrors . . .
entonio at gmail.com
entonio at gmail.com
Thu Jun 9 01:46:32 PDT 2011
No dia 2011/06/09, às 06:33, Jeff Wilson <jwilson at io.com> escreveu:
> On 6/8/2011 4:17 PM, António Pedro Marques wrote:
>> but the idea I have from the current and not-so-current panorama is
>> that
>> there isn't a single established theory that hasn't big holes in it -
>> meaning that even as they are useful for Technological Progress, one
>> shouldn't be completely shackled to their Fundamental Implications.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here.
That we may merrily make use of E = m c^2 or calculate the
distribution of electrons around an atom regardless of the importance
we attach to the philosophy of relativity or of the quanta.
More information about the Urth
mailing list