(urth) not quite Father Inire's mirrors . . .

entonio at gmail.com entonio at gmail.com
Thu Jun 9 01:46:32 PDT 2011


No dia 2011/06/09, às 06:33, Jeff Wilson <jwilson at io.com> escreveu:

> On 6/8/2011 4:17 PM, António Pedro Marques wrote:
>> but the idea I have from the current and not-so-current panorama is  
>> that
>> there isn't a single established theory that hasn't big holes in it -
>> meaning that even as they are useful for Technological Progress, one
>> shouldn't be completely shackled to their Fundamental Implications.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here.

That we may merrily make use of E = m c^2 or calculate the  
distribution of electrons around an atom regardless of the importance  
we attach to the philosophy of relativity or of the quanta. 


More information about the Urth mailing list