(urth) the prime calcula/his citadel and other quotes
António Pedro Marques
entonio at gmail.com
Thu Jan 20 11:36:25 PST 2011
Marc Aramini wrote (20-01-2011 18:48):
> But this last case is different, every time I look through the book I see
> more quotes equating motherhood with a particular set of characters, I
> see a consistent scheme, I see no contradictory evidence, only motivation
> unrevealed, so I have a certainty approaching 100% and I think my chance
> of convincing someone who sees the same data should be in the high 90th
> percentile. If all the data is explained and fits, then I can't see how
> it can be rationalized away, when doing so makes other statements seem
> merely like desciption of banal events or just kind of weird observations
> with no application, even though they are all consistent and pointing to
> the same conclusion.
That's a very valid point, I just don't think that it applies in this
particular case.
More information about the Urth
mailing list