(urth) the prime calcula/his citadel and other quotes
James Wynn
crushtv at gmail.com
Wed Jan 19 11:20:19 PST 2011
On 1/19/2011 12:46 PM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
> You do agree, though, that [if Wolfe wrote MotOE] even if there were
> no detective, there would be clues to the cover-up?
Sure. But they wouldn't necessarily be the clues a particular reader
would want. I consider it self-evident that Weer killed Lois and buried
her in that pit they dug. I have always thought that Weer had put
himself in peril by telling people she had left town. But it doesn't
bother me at all that Weer didn't record people coming around asking
what happened to her, or explain how he avoided the investigation. This
is a first person narrative, fully naturalized. Some authors would have
such a narrator answer every such open question. It is easy to do. But
just because it is easy to do, Wolfe insists that his readers do that
sort of literary janitorial work on their own -- because, obviously, he
beat the rap.
If you don't find the evidence that directly associates Silk and
Pas/Typhon compelling, fine.
In that case, who didn't say what is irrelevant.
But if the evidence is valid, then it is still irrelevant. The gods
didn't mention ancestry for their own reasons. Mamelta and Rigoglio
didn't see Pas in Silk for several possible reasons. The sybils didn't
mention Silk's similarity to Pas for whatever (but, heck, they mention
his similarity to Pike either but that seems to me to be a given as
well). If you accept that multiple people are seeing it since the
books were released, you're not going to change the evidence they are
seeing by arguing that you want it in some other format.
u+16b9
More information about the Urth
mailing list