(urth) the prime calcula/his citadel and other quotes

[James Wynn]

> António Pedro Marques wrote:
> I originally meant to show how you were imposing an unreasonable 
> demand on the text to dispell the notion that Silk might be Typhon's 
> clone - i.e., that you were saying that he was, and that the absence 
> of textual support was irrelevant because there was no explicit 
> textual refutation. 

Okay. I see what you were attempting exemplify. Unfortunately (hence my 
confusion) I didn't do that. To the contrary. I was arguing against 
Roy's and Gerry's assertion that, occulted hints be damned, it can't be 
so because Horn did not record people coming out and saying it. There 
are loads of textual support, so your presumption is wrong. Gerry does 
not deny that there is. He says it doesn't matter because everyone would 
be pointing at Silk and saying "There goes Pas!"

u+16b9