(urth) The green man is a fake
Jerry Friedman
jerry_friedman at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 17 08:29:53 PST 2011
> From: Jeff Wilson <jwilson at io.com>
>
> On 1/17/2011 12:27 AM, Jerry Friedman wrote:
> >> From: Jeff Wilson<jwilson at io.com>
> >
> >> On 1/16/2011 10:07 PM, Lee Berman wrote:
> >
> > [snip interesting points]
> >
> >>> Someone above noted the right bit of evidence..he has a nice set of
>teeth.
> >>> Exactly how does evolution allow for that? Needs a nice smile?
> >>
> >> The same way it apparently allows for contemporary humans to have wisdom
> >> teeth, appendixes, male nipples, sense of humor, musical aptitude, etc.
> >
> > Surely the green man would be an example of genetic engineering, not
>evolution.
> > He says they've altered the algae, so why wouldn't they have altered
>themselves?
>
> They would, but not more than the Author would consider repectful of the
> Creator.
Do we know that the green people or their creators share the Author's views
of respect toward the Creator? And do the various man-beasts show us the
limits of that? Wings the size of the anpiels' would be very handy for
photosynthetic people.
> > doesn't say he lies all the time. However, I think you've raised a good
> > possibility
> > that he's a fake put in Severian's path by whoever wants the New Sun.
>
> But there seems to be something of a tradition of enslaving green men as
> captive oracles.
That's a good point. We could perhaps imagine that the others have had
other purposes, such as carrying messages that will be believed when a
cacogen wouldn't be.
> And why can't he be authentic and still be put in Severian's path, eh?
Because of all the things we've been discussing: He should be a darker
color and have a different appearance (rather like an inhumu--just
kidding), and there's not enough energy in sunlight.
There are answers to all the arguments on either side, and it seems
ambiguous to me.
Jerry Friedman
More information about the Urth
mailing list