(urth) Threadtiquette

[DAVID STOCKHOFF]

If only interleaving were so easy. I try to do it but Webmail makes it difficult and Thunderbird isn't much better. I sometimes resort to dashes, and I hope that is effective.
Of course, I top-post because I am using email, and top-posting is best for email, where I don't need to read my own question before I read the response. It's also plainly the best format for this forum, because no one needs to read a poster's original question 6 times while reading the 6 answers posted in response. 
Naturally many people disagree---this is after all the Internet.

--- On Thu, 1/6/11, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Threadtiquette
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
Date: Thursday, January 6, 2011, 2:20 PM

2011/1/6 António Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>:

> I think interleaved replying - which is incompatible with topposting - helps
> keep focus and avoiding repetition. It also kind of ensures that you read
> what you're replying to.

Indeed, interleaved replying is _the_ defining motif of email/Usenet
communications. It has the unique feature that you can interrupt
someone without being rude. Some years ago I coined a word for this
style of semi-collaborative writing: Coinscription.

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20110106/54b11fa7/attachment-0004.htm>