(urth) The green man is a fake

Jerry Friedman jerry_friedman at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 17 08:29:53 PST 2011


> From: Jeff Wilson <jwilson at io.com>

> 
> On 1/17/2011 12:27 AM, Jerry Friedman wrote:
> >> From: Jeff Wilson<jwilson at io.com>
> >
> >> On  1/16/2011 10:07 PM, Lee Berman wrote:
> >
> > [snip interesting  points]
> >
> >>> Someone above noted the  right bit of  evidence..he has a nice set of 
>teeth.
> >>> Exactly how does   evolution allow for that? Needs a nice smile?
> >>
> >> The same  way it apparently  allows for contemporary humans to have  wisdom
> >> teeth, appendixes, male nipples,  sense of humor,  musical aptitude, etc.
> >
> > Surely the green man would be an example  of genetic engineering, not 
>evolution.
> > He says they've altered the  algae, so why wouldn't they have altered 
>themselves?
> 
> They would, but not  more than the Author would consider repectful of the 
> Creator.

Do we know that the green people or their creators share the Author's views
of respect toward the Creator?  And do the various man-beasts show us the
limits of that?  Wings the size of the anpiels' would be very handy for
photosynthetic people.
 
> >  doesn't say he lies all the time.  However, I think you've raised a  good
> > possibility
> > that he's a fake put in Severian's path by  whoever wants the New Sun.
> 
> But there seems to be something of a tradition  of enslaving green men as 
> captive oracles.

That's a good point.  We could perhaps imagine that the others have had
other purposes, such as carrying messages that will be believed when a
cacogen wouldn't be.

> And why can't he be authentic and  still be put in  Severian's path, eh?

Because of all the things we've been discussing: He should be a darker
color and have a different appearance (rather like an inhumu--just
kidding), and there's not enough energy in sunlight.

There are answers to all the arguments on either side, and it seems
ambiguous to me.

Jerry Friedman



      



More information about the Urth mailing list