(urth) Wolfe and Materialism

[Dan'l Danehy-Oakes]

Gerry Quinn wrote:

> I didn't say that at all.  What I'm saying is that a 'nuts and bolts'
> explanation - the Ploughman's explanation, if you like - needs to be there.
> Occasionally an author may throw a vagary and include events which are
> deliberately contradictory or inexplicable - but in books written to be
> understood, this tends to be rare.

The question then for me is this:

Can this nuts'n'bolts explanation be "it is a miracle" within the
context of the book, if the book has an explicitly religious
dimension?

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes