(urth) Wolfe and Materialism
danldo at gmail.com
Fri Feb 11 09:00:24 PST 2011
Gerry Quinn wrote:
> I didn't say that at all. What I'm saying is that a 'nuts and bolts'
> explanation - the Ploughman's explanation, if you like - needs to be there.
> Occasionally an author may throw a vagary and include events which are
> deliberately contradictory or inexplicable - but in books written to be
> understood, this tends to be rare.
The question then for me is this:
Can this nuts'n'bolts explanation be "it is a miracle" within the
context of the book, if the book has an explicitly religious
More information about the Urth