(urth) Agia's Weapons

[Dan'l Danehy-Oakes]

Ah, a subtilty that passed me by, and you were of course quite correct.

2011/12/20 António Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>:
> There was a time I know how to write, but it is long past.
> One point though:
>
> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote (20-12-2011 17:30):
>
>> António Pedro Marques wrote:
>>>
>>> What's guaranteed is that the Church is _right_ in teaching what it
>>> teaches.
>>> There's a difference.
>>
>>
>> Actually, there's a subtle difference. The Magisterium doesn't claim
>> that everything it teaches is right; it claims that, in matters of
>> faith and morals, it will not be _wrong_. There is a gap between
>> "right" and "not wrong" which allows for mysteries greater than human
>> words can teach.
>
>
> Of course. But that's not the point I was making. I wasn't saying everything
> the Magisterium teaches is right, but rather that the Magisterium was right
> in teaching it. This allows a whole lot more of leeway...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net



-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes