(urth) note Re: Short Sun blog

James Wynn crushtv at gmail.com
Mon Sep 27 14:35:33 PDT 2010

  On 9/27/2010 2:51 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Nick Lee<starwaterstrain at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Also, this idea that aliens could be
>> non-carbon based is just wild theory. We have no idea what aliens would look
>> like, and in all likelihood they are carbon-based because that's easiest way
>> for life to arise.
> While it's true that 100% of the life forms we know are carbon based,
> we are looking at a very localized sample. We have no idea what
> chemical or other bases may actually produce life. Any physical
> structure which can replicate itself (just-slightly-imperfectly), and
> exists in an environment in which it can do so, is likely to become
> some sort of life.

Still there's presumably nothing to have prevented a non-carbon-based 
life form from having occurred on Earth along side a carbon-based 
version. On the other hand, even though the carbon-based version 
appeared on Earth --in geologic terms-- as soon as the planet was cool 
enough to do so, it only happened here once in 3.5 billion years. So 
maybe carbon isn't all that likely an element either.


More information about the Urth mailing list