(urth) Wind god

[James Wynn]

>>
>> James Wynn-
>> But if you go the step further and ascribe malicious motives or
>> categorize the person's perceived error as "this is what you always do",
>> I'm going to read you as a jerk.
>
> António Pedro Marques-
> But that's a social shortcoming on your part, blaming the messenger 
> for the message. If the behaviour is repetitive, it's repetitive. We 
> have now a fresh example of 'Affirming P was an isolated tiny thing I 
> don't think anyone should be offended by it'. In a few days we'll have 
> 'Since P, then Q'. Ignoring that and making the protest sound like 
> thought police seems (seems) disingenuous.

Not thought police...smugly anal.

For the rest, I guess you already have my response.

~u+16b9