(urth) The Sorcerer's House Questions (*Major Spoilers*)

[Dave Tallman]

Thomas Bitterman

> This just begs the question.  The only record we have of them seeing any of
> this is from the letters that Bax has.  These are the very letters that are
> being called into doubt, at least the supernatural parts.
>
>
No, I am bringing in all the independent witnesses against your theory. To
support it, you have to say that the challenge note from George, the letters
from Madame Orizia, and the second letter from Doris are all forged or
edited by Bax. And I say that oversteps the bounds of the suspension of
disbelief. About the only letters admitted as factual at this point are
those to and from Shell, and letters from Millie.

> Windows into Faerie, werewolves, vampires, visions of the future, astral
> projection, triannuluses (triannuli?), houses that grow and rearrange -
> these are all harder to swallow than lucking into money.  Not everything he
> says is false, just the stuff about Faerie.
>
>
All right then, what is your rational explanation for him "lucking into
money"? Was a deed to a house just handed to him? If so, why? And then he
just happens to inherit a valuable chunk of real estate?  Please show
in-story clues to what really happened.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100330/1f560d5a/attachment-0004.htm>