(urth) Religious writers and audiences
brunians at brunians.org
brunians at brunians.org
Sun Jun 6 13:36:38 PDT 2010
An agnostic reserves his opinion.
He does not know.
This is a rational position.
Knowledge is based upon experience.
If a person has not had experience to convince him of the existence of
God, it is not rational for him to believe in God.
This is true.
Neither is it rational for him to not believe.
This is the point in the discussion at which atheists prove, to their own
satisfaction, that they have no nose.
.
> That thought occurred to me but I sidestepped it.
>
> Tony's understanding is closer to mine. Agnosticism has always struck me
> as atheism within a theistic context, as one might refer to a disease
> within a clinical context. If a priest turns atheist, he doesn't join a
> Unitarian church---he just nurses his doubts. Within that context it is
> ideologically impossible to conceive of true atheism, or even to use the
> word politely. In a word, it is a euphemism.
>
> But that's just a hunch. I suppose what I do is more like "rejecting
> belief in a divinity but accepting the possibility that a divinity exists,
> and continuing as though the possibility does not in fact exist."
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:09:17 -0400
> From: John Watkins <john.watkins04 at gmail.com>
> To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Subject: Re: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
> Message-ID:
> <AANLkTinhKvnRVDKsz-TC_ht0B0g0SjEoTOo3yXc_Y06r at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I don't know that I accept that...there's a word for the position of
> rejecting belief in a divinity but accepting the possibility that a
> divinity
> exists, and that word is "agnosticism."
>
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Tony Ellis
> <tonyellis69 at btopenworld.com>wrote:
>
>
>> > John Watkins wrote:
>>
>>> > > Atheists by definition reject the existence of a
>>> > > deity.
>>>
>> >
>> > Well, no. Atheists by definition reject *belief* in the existence of a
>> > deity. Not the same thing.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
More information about the Urth
mailing list