(urth) Religious writers and audiences

[brunians at brunians.org]

Me or him?

.


>
> I agree with everything you say, even though I don't share your
> world/religious views. Thanks for sharing.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:27:26 -0400
>> From: dstockhoff at verizon.net
>> To: urth at lists.urth.net
>> Subject: Re: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
>>
>> Yes, it is.
>>
>> And in a sense I agree with Brunians, because I too see the natural
>> universe as screaming evidence of something---in my case the absolute
>> unnecessariness of a anthropomorphized deity---and see no point in
>> forming an argument connecting them. It just is.
>>
>> However, I don't see people who disagree with that as insane.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:02:58 +0300
>> From: Pedro Pereira <domus_artemis at hotmail.com>
>> To: <urth at lists.urth.net>
>> Subject: Re: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
>> Message-ID: <COL105-W33547DB7D831FD0BAFD37585D40 at phx.gbl>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>>
>> Fair enough. Guess I missed the memo on Brunians' views and I
>> misinterpreted him. However it is in my opinion pointless to argue such
>> views (or at least I have no interest in arguing those and for that I
>> appologise to Brunians) when one takes "the natural world (as he defines
>> it) and the entire universe to be an argument for his beliefs and in
>> short, his observations are beliefs and his beliefs are observations".
>>
>>
>>
>> Over and out.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969_______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net