(urth) Religious writers and audiences

[brunians at brunians.org]

I don't see people who disagree with me as insane.

Once again you play fast and loose with terms.

.


> Yes, it is.
>
> And in a sense I agree with Brunians, because I too see the natural
> universe as screaming evidence of something---in my case the absolute
> unnecessariness of a anthropomorphized deity---and see no point in forming
> an argument connecting them. It just is.
>
> However, I don't see people who disagree with that as insane.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:02:58 +0300
> From: Pedro Pereira <domus_artemis at hotmail.com>
> To: <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Subject: Re: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
> Message-ID: <COL105-W33547DB7D831FD0BAFD37585D40 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Fair enough. Guess I missed the memo on Brunians' views and I
> misinterpreted him. However it is in my opinion pointless to argue such
> views (or at least I have no interest in arguing those and for that I
> appologise to Brunians) when one takes "the natural world (as he defines
> it) and the entire universe to be an argument for his beliefs and in
> short, his observations are beliefs and his beliefs are observations".
>
>
>
> Over and out.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>