(urth) Religious writers and audiences

[brunians at brunians.org]

And if this perspective was true, where then would you be?

.


> I think that's right.  brunians has repeatedly referred to his direct
> experiences of what others would call the supernatural.  It may be that,
> from his perspective (or feigned perspective), it makes as much sense to
> deny the existence of God as to deny the existence of the sun.
>
> Even if I shared this perspective, I'd like to think I'd understand that
> most other people didn't and behave accordingly.
>
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Stockhoff
> <dstockhoff at verizon.net>wrote:
>
>> Pedro
>>
>> Brunians is not being evasive. Rather, as far as I can tell, he
>> considers
>> the existence of the natural world (as he defines it) and the entire
>> universe to be an argument for his beliefs; in short, his observations
>> are
>> beliefs and his beliefs are observations. There is no light between them
>> and
>> therefore no need to construct an argument for them.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:41:17 +0300
>> From: Pedro Pereira <domus_artemis at hotmail.com>
>>
>> To: <urth at lists.urth.net>
>> Subject: Re: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
>> Message-ID: <COL105-W362F28CE7274F1620D236285D40 at phx.gbl>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>>
>>
>> What!??!?!
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm not reading a book and demanding that the author makes it "easier"
>> for
>> me; I'm asking for a straight answer from someone that accuses me (and
>> others) of beying insane in an internet forum. But thanks for nothing.
>> I'm
>> not going to waste more time with this.
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net