(urth) Religious writers and audiences

[David Stockhoff]

Pedro

Brunians is not being evasive. Rather, as far as I can tell, he considers the existence of the natural world (as he defines it) and the entire universe to be an argument for his beliefs; in short, his observations are beliefs and his beliefs are observations. There is no light between them and therefore no need to construct an argument for them.

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:41:17 +0300
From: Pedro Pereira <domus_artemis at hotmail.com>
To: <urth at lists.urth.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
Message-ID: <COL105-W362F28CE7274F1620D236285D40 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"


What!??!?!

 

I'm not reading a book and demanding that the author makes it "easier" for me; I'm asking for a straight answer from someone that accuses me (and others) of beying insane in an internet forum. But thanks for nothing. I'm not going to waste more time with this.