(urth) Religious writers and audiences

Pedro Pereira domus_artemis at hotmail.com
Sun Jun 6 09:59:34 PDT 2010


I didn't use any terms, you did. So I don't understand what is insane about my usage of terms that I didn't use in the first place. I just asked a straight question that you answered with another question in true "master to apprentice" fashion. Your friends must be proud.

 

As I said before this discussion for me ends here. We can just save ourselves (and others in this list) from more wasted time.

 



> I am actually criticizing your use of terms, which I maintain is insane.
> 
> The fact that just about everybody else, not only atheists, uses terms in
> a similar fashion to you is totally nuncupatory.
> 
> .
> 
> 
> >
> > Fair enough. Guess I missed the memo on Brunians' views and I
> > misinterpreted him. However it is in my opinion pointless to argue such
> > views (or at least I have no interest in arguing those and for that I
> > appologise to Brunians) when one takes "the natural world (as he defines
> > it) and the entire universe to be an argument for his beliefs and in
> > short, his observations are beliefs and his beliefs are observations".
> >
> >
> >
> > Over and out.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 10:05:12 -0400
> >> From: dstockhoff at verizon.net
> >> To: urth at lists.urth.net
> >> Subject: Re: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
> >>
> >> Pedro
> >>
> >> Brunians is not being evasive. Rather, as far as I can tell, he
> >> considers the existence of the natural world (as he defines it) and the
> >> entire universe to be an argument for his beliefs; in short, his
> >> observations are beliefs and his beliefs are observations. There is no
> >> light between them and therefore no need to construct an argument for
> >> them.
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 3
> >> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:41:17 +0300
> >> From: Pedro Pereira <domus_artemis at hotmail.com>
> >> To: <urth at lists.urth.net>
> >> Subject: Re: (urth) Religious writers and audiences
> >> Message-ID: <COL105-W362F28CE7274F1620D236285D40 at phx.gbl>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> >>
> >>
> >> What!??!?!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm not reading a book and demanding that the author makes it "easier"
> >> for me; I'm asking for a straight answer from someone that accuses me
> >> (and others) of beying insane in an internet forum. But thanks for
> >> nothing. I'm not going to waste more time with this.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Urth Mailing List
> >> To post, write urth at urth.net
> >> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
> > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969_______________________________________________
> > Urth Mailing List
> > To post, write urth at urth.net
> > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100606/3b9419d3/attachment-0003.htm>


More information about the Urth mailing list