(urth) Monkey business
Jeff Wilson
jwilson at io.com
Thu Jul 8 22:11:20 PDT 2010
On 7/8/2010 11:31 PM, Mr Thalassocrat wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Roy C. Lackey <rclackey at stic.net
> <mailto:rclackey at stic.net>> wrote:
>
> Okay, let's see if we can find some middle ground in all this monkey
> business.
>
> That some characters in the Urth Cycle are compared, in some way, with
> monkeys is beyond dispute. Since Wolfe wrote it, I think almost everyone
> will agree that the simian markers signify *something*. What seems
> to be at
> issue is what that something is.
>
> There are also some appearances of monkey-like creatures, including the
> dog-ape hybrid figure who looked in on Severian in the lazaret.
>
> ** Not very important, but I don't think a dog/ape hybrid is intended.
> "Cynecephalus" (dog-headed) is a term which seems to get applied to
> baboons - eg /Papio cynocephalus
> //http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_Baboon// /
Yes, but the translator says that animal names are given by role rather
than by taxonomy.
--
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
IEEE Student Chapter Blog at
< http://ieeetamut.org >
More information about the Urth
mailing list