(urth) The mystery of the image of an astronaut cleaned by Rudesind
David Stockhoff
dstockhoff at verizon.net
Tue Jul 6 19:27:21 PDT 2010
That's exactly the Lewis Carroll I had in mind. And yes, when a little
girl goes through a looking glass ... it's not a Nabokov reference.
Still, there is a sinister touch to Thecla's tale. Naturally.
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Lee Berman <severiansola at hotmail.com> writes:
>
>
>> Lewis Carroll was a lifelong bachelor who enjoyed taking nude pictures
>> of pre-pubescent girls. If you think Gene Wolfe is alluding to him with
>> Inire and his looking glass/mirrors and finds both a bit creepy I would
>> not disagree. Still I must guess Wolfe admires Lewis Carroll as he does
>> other referenced authors such as J.L. Borges, Rudyard Kipling and Mary
>> Shelley.
>>
>
> It's probably also worth mentioning that several modern historians believe
> this was nowhere near as shocking as it sounds to modern sensibilities.
> At the time, photography was very new and photography advocates and
> hobbyists were trying to treat it as an art form akin to painting, with
> very similar goals. The classical nude, of a variety of ages, was common
> subject material for painting, and hence it's likely that photography
> enthusiasts considered it suitable subject material for photography as
> well, for a variety of artistic reasons that don't necessarily have
> anything directly to do with sex or eroticism. There's also some evidence
> that child nudes were seen as a symbol of innocence and were simply not
> viewed with the approbation that they are today, to the extent that they
> may have appeared on Christmas cards and the like.
>
> For much more on this topic, see the work of Hugues Lebailly, who among
> others has been calling into question the traditional interpretation of
> Carroll's photographic subjects (which are far more varied than just young
> girls as is often believed).
>
> On a similar front, there's also some reason to believe that Carroll's
> supposed preference for young girls over other companions is way overblown
> and is based largely on a few written comments taken out of context. See,
> for example, <http://carrollmyth.com/contrariwise/cldandfemales.html>.
>
>
More information about the Urth
mailing list