(urth) Who's Right?

[Dan'l Danehy-Oakes]

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Gerry Quinn <gerryq at indigo.ie> wrote:
> From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <danldo at gmail.com>

>> Actually, there's nothing terribly revolutionary about Jesus'
>> teachings, though they were unusual coming from a Second Temple Jew.
>> Either he was the Son of God or he was nobody important.
>
> Muslims would disagree.  As I understand it they believe Jesus was not the
> Son of God, but still believe that he was a great prophet.

But Muslims would also agree that there was nothing terribly
revolutionary about Isa's teachings; they would say that he taught the
same Qu'ran as Musa and Muhammed.

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes