(urth) Who's Right?

[Dan'l Danehy-Oakes]

Oh, dear. We're back to the ad-hominem crap.

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Matthew Weber <palaeologos at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2010/12/3 António Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>
>>
>> Matthew Weber wrote (03-12-2010 18:48):
>>>
>>> 2010/12/3 António Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:entonio at gmail.com>>
>>>
>>>    Matthew Weber wrote (03-12-2010 18:33):
>>>
>>>        Really?  What did he say that his antecedents didn't?
>>>
>>>    Please present his antecedents' teachings.
>>>
>>> You'll find those teachings under the heading "The Old Testament".
>>>  Enjoy.
>>>
>>> http://quod.lib.umich.edu/k/kjv/browse.html
>>
>> Come back when you have something to say.
>
> That's rather ironic coming from you, isn't it?
> --
> Matt +
>
> Everything is worth what its purchaser will pay for it.
>     Publilius Syrus (First century B.C.), Maxim 847
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>



-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes