(urth) Madregot & Yesod Redux

[DAVID STOCKHOFF]

Yes and no. We are told the universes "advance." There must be sequence even if time itself is meaningless.

--- On Tue, 8/17/10, António Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> wrote:

From: António Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Madregot & Yesod Redux
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
Date: Tuesday, August 17, 2010, 8:55 AM

Lee Berman wrote (17-08-2010 13:38):
>
>
>> As the Jordan-Wolfe interview clearly suggests that Urth is a past
>> iteration of Earth I think this rules out the guess that Yesod is our
>> universe. Too bad. It would have been nice to get Jesus worked into the
>> story somehow, however tangentially.
>
>> David Stockhoff- Why do you think this rules that out?
>
> If Earth is a future manvantara version of Urth and Yesod is in the past
> from Urth it would seem that Earth cannot be in Yesod.
>
> But that's just being logical. I don't really claim that the puny mental
> tools of a primate species from a small blue planet on the edge of the
> galaxy are sufficient to grasp the universe and beyond.
>
> But perhaps my logic is faulty. Do you see an alternate interpretation?

For the umpteenth time, temporality across universes is meaningless. Earth 
can be both in Urth's 'past' and 'future'. If you like it, Briah gnabs into 
Yesod and Yesod gnabs into Briah.

Not that I think Earth is in Yesod - for the quite simple reason that 
there's zilch about Yesod that connects it to us. One might as well wonder 
whether Winston Churchill worked as a postman in Togo in his spare time.
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100817/94ac25a8/attachment-0004.htm>