(urth) Resurrections

Robert Thornton oblate777 at gmail.com
Sun Aug 1 18:00:30 PDT 2010


Josh,

When I asked you politely to focus on Wolfe instead of other issues, note that no one condemned you or supported you.

The jury is still out I think. As for my own opinion--count me in, Mr. Stockhoff.

Rob

On Aug 1, 2010, at 8:57 PM, David Stockhoff wrote:

> I second John. That's 2.
> 
> brunians at brunians.org wrote:
>> The feeling is quiet mutual.
>> 
>> Most of us == who? Most of the voices in your head?
>> 
>> How do you know that most of the list is just putting up with me?
>> 
>> You have taken a survey?
>> 
>> Might you publish your results here?
>> 
>> There are several noninnumerates here, one or more of whom may comment
>> upon your statistics: I may myself.
>> 
>> In the meantime, if you wish to affect my involuntary removal from this
>> list, I suggest that you apply to the owner of the list, and not to me,
>> who - I am not sure if you get this - does not respect you and will not do
>> what you want me to do.
>> 
>> Do you have any questions?
>> 
>> .
>> 
>> .
>> 
>>  
>>> You are an unpleasant aspect of this list that most of us are just putting
>>> up with.  I wish you would refrain from personal insults or intentionally
>>> enigmatic digressions.  We'd all be better off.
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 7:47 PM, <brunians at brunians.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>    
>>>> And a society that is physically deteriorating due to climate change,
>>>> that
>>>> is also in the middle of a huge war, tends not support sports such as
>>>> recreational mountain climbing.
>>>> 
>>>> Why do you always presume, Stockhoff?
>>>> 
>>>> Don't you ever know?
>>>> 
>>>> Do you believe that folks don't notice you saying nasty things whenever
>>>> I
>>>> ask a question you don't wish to answer?
>>>> 
>>>> How stupid are you, exactly?
>>>> 
>>>> I keep going back and forth between you and the JW's in my perennial
>>>> urth
>>>> list dumbest monkey test.
>>>> 
>>>> .
>>>> 
>>>>      
>>>>> Presumably it was far from where anyone would normally go.
>>>>> 
>>>>> António Pedro Marques wrote:
>>>>>        
>>>>>> And isn't Typhon supposed to be *2* thousand years before Severian?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> (Never mind that Typhon was up there in his mountain all the time.
>>>>>>          
>>>> Did
>>>>      
>>>>>> no one think of going there?)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> David Stockhoff wrote:
>>>>>>          
>>>>>>> 200 autarchs could rule an average of 5 years each over 1000 years.
>>>>>>>            
>>>> If
>>>>      
>>>>>>> 20 of these autarchs ruled an average of 20 years, the remaining 180
>>>>>>> would each have to rule for about 3+1/3 years to maintain the
>>>>>>>            
>>>> average.
>>>>      
>>>>>>> It's possible. In such a system, the individuality of each autarch,
>>>>>>>            
>>>> all
>>>>      
>>>>>>> but the greatest, would be inconsequential and utterly lost. Which
>>>>>>>            
>>>> is
>>>>      
>>>>>>> exactly what has happened in imperial dynasties. England's monarch,
>>>>>>>            
>>>> by
>>>>      
>>>>>>> contrast, was much more robust even at its weakest.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If we know only 3 names from the past 1000 years, perhaps that is
>>>>>>>            
>>>> why.
>>>>      
>>>>>>> If only these 3 ruled for 50 each and the remainder for still only
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>> 4 years on average, that makes 200 in total. It's then slightly more
>>>>>>> plausible.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But is this important?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jeff Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>            
>>>>>>>> On 8/1/2010 1:36 PM, David Stockhoff wrote:
>>>>>>>>              
>>>>>>>>> Some autarchs may have ruled for only a week.
>>>>>>>>>                
>>>>>>>> That's not unusual for popes or kings either. John-Paul I reigned a
>>>>>>>> month, Jane Grey for 9 days, and IIRC the Hawaiian Kamehameha
>>>>>>>>              
>>>> dynasty
>>>>      
>>>>>>>> ended with the last couple of heirs reigning for less than a day
>>>>>>>> apiece. These rates can't be sustained with anything like
>>>>>>>>              
>>>> stability,
>>>>      
>>>>>>>> and are more than compensated for by the Victorias and Henrys, who
>>>>>>>> come to the throne young and live on into vigorous old age.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Appian-Severian-Valeria cover a minimum of eight decades, I'd say,
>>>>>>>>              
>>>> and
>>>>      
>>>>>>>> Ymar could easily have been one of the child-Autarchs as well as
>>>>>>>> reigning long enough to be credited with his various deeds and
>>>>>>>> commands, even if he didn't actually do or complete all of them.
>>>>>>>>              
>>>> This
>>>>      
>>>>>>>> leaves about nine hundred years for all but one of the hundreds the
>>>>>>>> Old Autarch spoke of, surely they can do better than that? In the
>>>>>>>>              
>>>> 900
>>>>      
>>>>>>>> years following the Norman Conquest there were only 45 English
>>>>>>>> monarchs.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>              
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Urth Mailing List
>>>>>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>>>>>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>>>>>>            
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Urth Mailing List
>>>>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>>>>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
>>>>>> Virus Database (VPS): 100801-0, 08/01/2010
>>>>>> Tested on: 8/1/2010 6:30:23 PM
>>>>>> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 ALWIL Software.
>>>>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>          
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Urth Mailing List
>>>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>>>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>>>> 
>>>>>        
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Urth Mailing List
>>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>>> 
>>>>      
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Urth Mailing List
>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>>    
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
>> Virus Database (VPS): 100801-0, 08/01/2010
>> Tested on: 8/1/2010 8:45:25 PM
>> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 ALWIL Software.
>> http://www.avast.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net




More information about the Urth mailing list