(urth) GUTs and so on

Stuart Hamm hammstu at sbcglobal.net
Tue Aug 24 15:13:07 PDT 2010


I don't think a tree ate Horn. I have my own despicable explanation for what happened in the pit.

o, please feel free to reply offline to me on this one, or point me o the link..!!
I think Silk/Horn became the "3rd quill in the pencase"
             
 Mobile   (415) 786-3624
STUHAMM.COM
FACEBOOK/STUARTHAMM
myspace.com/stuhamm
Skype   stuart.hamm
     


--- On Tue, 8/24/10, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote:

From: James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) GUTs and so on
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
Date: Tuesday, August 24, 2010, 3:08 PM


>> James Wynn -
>> I am feeling a little singled out.
> Dan'l- Honest, you shouldn't. That post has been gradually brewing ever since
> "the Neighbors are the Trees."

LOL
Well, *I* think the Neighbors *are* at least some of the trees, so there ya are. And the Rajan did refer to the trees as "sleepy" which is what you'd expect from dream-travelers. IIRC someone claimed the Rajan's staff made from a vine  was an inhumi and that the Rajan talked to it. So it gets worse. It's easy for me to imagine how the Neighbors could be trees. It's impossible for me to see how the inhumi could be vines. But the second is more plainly stated than the first. I don't really understand how all that fits together.

I don't think a tree ate Horn. I have my own despicable explanation for what happened in the pit.


> Craig Brewer -- [snip]As much as I disagree
> with MOST of Borski's stuff, say, one thing I appreciate about him is that he
> will occasionally take a step back and reflect on why his theories matter and
> how they might change our general understanding and even thematic
> interpretations. [snip]In the most recent case, I'd want to know not just IF Fava is Hy, but I'd also want to know how that changes what we're supposed to think about Silk/Silkhorn in terms of his prophet-status, etc.

Well, there's this metaphor that I noted in "The Book of the Long Sun" that befuddled me for a long time. And Hy as Fava resolved that riddle. So maybe you'll like this. I'm not sure Hy being Fava reveals *in itself* anything thematically about Silk or the Rajan. But isn't Hy an important enough character to warrant her own thematic vehicles? Although it does fit nicely with the little play of Silk and Hyacinth as Simon Magus and Helena, it is hardly necessary to it.


u+16b9
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100824/bfd9d07a/attachment-0003.htm>


More information about the Urth mailing list