(urth) Standard Wolfean riddle

António Pedro Marques entonio at gmail.com
Tue Aug 17 05:08:26 PDT 2010


'So THAT we know what it is that you think is not true?'. It was an answer 
to your question of why you're being asked to explain something you don't 
think it is true.

David Stockhoff wrote (17-08-2010 12:29):
> If you've been reading this thread carefully, yes.
>
> António Pedro Marques wrote:
>> David Stockhoff wrote:
>>> António Pedro Marques wrote:
>>>> David Stockhoff wrote (13-08-2010 01:52):
>>>>> As for Yesod being before Briah,
>>>>
>>>> What would that mean? What would its opposite mean?
>>>>
>>>> I suppose you mean Yesod having 'gnabed into' Briah or a 'predecessor'
>>>> of Briah. But I don't think it can be put that way. Even if in our
>>>> analogies there is a succession A -> B -> C, the '->' isn't really
>>>> temporal, so it's more of something we use for our benefit than
>>>> something which has true significance - i.e., A -> B doesn't really
>>>> connect A to B.
>>> I'm not sure why I'm being asked to explain something I don't think is
>>> true.
>>
>> So we know what it is that you think is not true?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
>> ---
>> avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
>> Virus Database (VPS): 100815-0, 08/15/2010
>> Tested on: 8/15/2010 6:58:35 PM
>> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 ALWIL Software.
>> http://www.avast.com
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net




More information about the Urth mailing list