(urth) The Sorcerer's House Questions (*Major Spoilers*)

brunians at brunians.org brunians at brunians.org
Sat Apr 17 08:28:44 PDT 2010


I get the impression that the faery stuff is all real.

.

> Dave Tallman wrote:
>
>
>>>>
>
>>>>Why the complete rejection of the fantastic, anyway. You wouldn't read
>>>> "Pirate Freedom" with the attitude: "Time
>>>>travel is impossible, so whatever the narrator says about going to the
>>>> past must be lies."  This is a Wolfe story,
>>>>and he often writes of the fantastic. So why not accept it?
>>>>
>
> Just on this point, and, although I'm not yet totally convinced that TSH
> is actually just a big con, I think there are a number of reasons why it
> would fit perfectly with Wolfe's attitude towards the fantastic.
>
>>From early on, Wolfe has recognized the two sides of the fantastic, both
>> the actual pure wonder of it AND the potential for deception, both in
>> worlds where it's real and worlds where it's all fabrication. The entire
>> puzzle/mystery form of his writing is constantly playing with the idea
>> that everything could have some other explanation. Sometimes the
>> explanation is magical, often when we or characters expect our own
>> "realistic" assumptions to be obvious and certain. But, at the same time,
>> his magical characters are, even when "really" magical, also often full
>> of illusion and deception: is the Claw *really* a magical trinket, or is
>> it Severian's higher nature that does the "magic," for example?
>
> I mean, there are other examples, of course, but thematically, it seems to
> fit perfectly well with Wolfe's attitude toward the fantastic and the way
> it calls on us decide what is true or false, which is something his
> characters are always having to face (Silk and the Outsider, Able and his
> role in the world, Horn and his identity/duty, etc.). So maybe the
> question with Bax is whether or not his ability to tell a wonderful,
> compelling, puzzling story (which is, of course, also Wolfe's talent) is
> innocent or dangerous? From that angle, it seems like one of the "big
> issues" with TSH is the relationship between fantasy and dishonesty. That
> seems like a perfectly appropriate theme for a writer who has always
> maintained that fantasy is one of the best ways to deal with the "really
> real" -- why shouldn't he write a story that explicitly explores the other
> side of that coin?
>
> Craig
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>





More information about the Urth mailing list