(urth) (no subject)

[brunians at brunians.org]

I am absolutely in favor of enforcement of American Indian treaty rights
and have been for my whole life. I don't really see any way that the
conquest of North America could have been avoided, but it's not something
that I think was good or fair.

I'm also, as has been noted, a Confederate sympathizer.



.





> Would it relate to Native American Land Rights?
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:29 AM, <brunians at brunians.org> wrote:
>
>> > brunians at brunians.org wrote:
>> >> Property rights are sacred, unalienable and a matter of faith.
>>
>> >> You believe in them or you don't. Attempt to violate mine at your
>> peril.
>>
>> > I am so pleased to see you turn out in favor of native title!
>>
>> It is the standard Jeffersonian position:
>>
>> ___
>> We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal,
>>                           ^^^^ ^^^^^^^
>> that they are endowed, by their CREATOR, with certain unalienable
>> Rights,
>> that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
>> ---
>>
>> As I have mentioned, this list is not exclusive, and the original list
>> that Brother Thomas came up with had 'property' instead of 'the pursuit
>> of
>> happiness'. People have argued from that day to this one whether the
>> substitution was felicitous.
>>
>> I have no idea what you mean by 'native title'. Perhaps you will choose
>> to
>> enlighten me: in any case I wish you joy of your superior knowledge.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net