(urth) Silk corrupted?

[Son of Witz]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dan'l Danehy-Oakes [mailto:danldo at gmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 03:01 PM
>To: 'The Urth Mailing List'
>Subject: Re: (urth) Silk corrupted?
>
>On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Son of Witz <sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org> wrote:
>> violence?
>> that may be overstepping.  any great work is larger than it's author's intention.  But I'm sympathetic with your feeling, despite having to poke at it a bit.
>
>Interpretive violence. If that's too strong for you, OK.
_______________________________

on a tangent, "interpretive violence" reminds me of Biblical Violence.
I love this song:
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=hella%20biblical%20violence&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wv#

_________________________________



>> What I don't understand, all Christ arguments aside, is "How does a star have the consciousness of Severian? How does a star resurrect humans? How does a star steer time?
>
>I have long since given up trying to make sense of this and accepted it as
>a canonical miracle in the Briahverse.
__________________________
see, it's that more than anything that makes me assign Severian's consciousness into Diety category.

~witz