(urth) Silk for calde blog: Wolfe thesis

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes danldo at gmail.com
Fri Dec 18 10:10:31 PST 2009


The question is, then, whether the Orthodox or the Catholic are orthodox as
regards the _filioque_ clause.

(Will the filioque clause be coming down your chimney this Christmas? Have
you been a good brunian or a bad brunian?)

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:07 AM,  <brunians at brunians.org> wrote:
> The original group is the orthodox group: there was no one before them,
> they get to say what is orthodox. Any deviation from what that original
> group says is therefore, by definition, heterodox.
>
> QED.
>
>
> .
>
>>>>>> Orthodox Christianity (including Catholicism) is Christianity. The
>>>>>> forms
>>>>>> of Protestantism are Christianity with various bits sliced off.
>>>>
>>>>>> Well, EXCUUUUUUUSE me!   Martin Luther, John Calvin and their
>>>>>> followers
>>>>>> would beg to differ.
>>>>
>>>>> Heretics all.
>>>>
>>>> ....And so Josh got the Christmas party started at the Urth List.
>>
>>> Bah! Humbug!
>>
>> Now you sound like a Puritan.
>> :-D
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>



-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes



More information about the Urth mailing list