(urth) Weekly blog links

Stuart Hamm hammstu at sbcglobal.net
Tue Apr 14 19:11:56 PDT 2009


I agree FWIW
I am a big fan of the short stories (earlier than later), and TBotNS got me hooked for life...but for my "Desert Island " book I would take  Long Sun and Short Sun as 1 book and be happy to read it over and over and over and over and....

          -\\~S~//-  
     Skype   stuart.hamm
myspace.com/stuhamm
      stuarthamm.net


--- On Tue, 4/14/09, don doggett <kingwukong at yahoo.com> wrote:
From: don doggett <kingwukong at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Weekly blog links
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 6:55 PM


Doggerel
www.don-doggett.blogspot.com


> Many people find Long Sun accessible and satisfying because
> they think it has a generally reliable narrator and the
> narrative is not so occulted. They are wrong. I think the
> most valid criticism of Short Sun (I don't agree with it) is
> that it's very well crafted but it's just tooooo Wolfean:
> It's a bridge too far. Yet, many of the puzzles in Long Sun
> that readers didn't know were puzzles are resolved in Short
> Sun--can ONLY be resolved in the Short Sun--and the answers
> go right over those readers heads because they weren't
> looking for answers. So is that a defect in the books?

I agree, and I would go a step farther and say that LS and SS are really one
novel. SS is basically a continuation of the epilogue in LS and doesn't
stand at all on its own. And LS is brilliantly written (better than New Sun,
really) but the plot is unsatisfying without the revelations of SS.

Don




      
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20090414/2b4ae887/attachment-0004.htm>


More information about the Urth mailing list